Path: chuka.playstation.co.uk!scea!peter_alau@playstation.sony.com From: Elliott Lee Newsgroups: scee.yaroze.beginners Subject: Re: Problems with TimView Date: Tue, 12 May 1998 13:28:41 -0700 Organization: Cisco Systems Lines: 51 Message-ID: <3558B0F9.5F9BD9C1@netmagic.net> References: <3558B9CE.B4E@easynet.co.uk> Reply-To: tenchi@cisco.com NNTP-Posting-Host: dhcp-e-39-237.cisco.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.03 [en] (Win95; U) Hi, Are you absolutely sure that you set your GsSPRITE parameters correctly, accounting for the width AND the bits-per-pixel? Chances are, your TIM is being displayed correctly in its vertical aspect but about 50% in its horizontal... Your 320x240x8 image is also too large to be displayed all at once. The limit of the Yaroze hardware is an 256x256 image, no matter what the bits-per-pixel are. Break up the 320x240 into 2 TIMS (e.g. 160x240). philip gooch wrote: > > Hi All > > Just got my Net Yaroze last week! > > I'm having problems using TimView (the Yaroze program for checking that > your bitmaps have converted to TIM correctly) to display large images on > the TV screen. > > I've used TimUtil to convert a 64 * 64 4 bit image to TIM and it displays > fine on the Yaroze with TimView (though it looks about half the size it > should), and I've converted a 320 * 240 8 bit image (making sure that it > is correctly aligned and not clashing with the double buffer - i.e has an > image org of 320, 0 and a CLUT org of 480, 0) but this larger image will > not display correctly with TimView. > > Only the top left hand quarter of the image is shown on screen and it is > stretched out vertically and squashed horizontally. > > I'm not at the stage of writing code to display it onscreen myself, but I > wondered if I'm doing something wrong with TimUtil, or maybe TimView has > a limit on the size of images it can display. If I resize my original 320 > *240 image in Photoshop to 160 * 120 and reconvert to TIM it displays > fine in TimUtil (but again, looks about half the size it should). > > Does TimView use high-res (640 * 480) mode? That would explain why the > images look too small on the TV screen. But what could be causing the 320 > * 240 image to display incorrectly? > > Cheers > > Phil > philg@easynet.co.uk -- - e! tenchi@netmagic.net http://www.netmagic.net/~tenchi/yaroze/