Path: chuka.playstation.co.uk!news From: Robert Swan Newsgroups: scee.yaroze.freetalk.english Subject: Re: SCEA Date: Tue, 18 Aug 1998 08:54:23 +0100 Organization: I wish! Lines: 38 Message-ID: <35D9332F.4D48@mdx.ac.uk> References: <6qib7h$ldg19@chuka.playstation.co.uk> <35D899FB.2105F7A7@bigfoot.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: nova.mdx.ac.uk Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.01 (X11; I; SunOS 5.5 sun4u) Darco wrote: > The SCEA site IS dull. Extremely dull. It's partly dull because most of the > SCEA members are sleepers - which is hard to imagine that someone would pay > $750 for something and then not use it to it's potential. If there were more > active members, there'd actually be something to update. But there's probably > a reason for this. One of the things about running the short course is that so far on both course nearly half (or more) of the people own yarozes, of which a startling majority have had them ages and never approached them for more than a brief 'kickaround'. As usual the reasons are that its hard to start with etc, etc but everyone on the course does progress fairly rapidly, so if there are others out there reading this still put off attempting to code, for gods sake try :) > SCEE has GDUK. And that's a big incentive... I'd love to enter GDUK. Well, > I'd also love to even have access the SCEE site, but that's a whole nother > gripe that I'm not about to get into again. (Yall are probably tired of > hearing me gripe about that anyway, sorry) Gduk is an incentive, but then again me and others have been doing stuff anyway, and even when we're not we still talk (a load of rubbish). Seriously guys, whoever should sort out his access to SCEE should sort out his access to SCEE, it has been a while. > ...I wonder... if... I came up with a simple-to-implement, easy-to-update, > and visualy-pleasing web site design if they might consider it... OR maybe > they are already working on this fabled site, and that's why the current one > isn't getting updated often. I actually quite like the layout of the SCEA site as its simple and relatively cool looking. I also did like the old SCEE one in terms of looks, but it was a crappy mess. What I wont do (and I hope noone else really does) is complain about anything to do with the new SCEE web site, considering we have had hundreds of chances to give them ideas and suggestions before :) Rob