Path: chuka.playstation.co.uk!news
From: Max <mad.max@which.net>
Newsgroups: scee.yaroze.freetalk.english
Subject: Is the PS2 Really that bad?...
Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2000 20:48:54 +0000
Organization: Max Studios
Lines: 19
Message-ID: <38CD5436.EAA1629C@which.net>
NNTP-Posting-Host: p261-bantam-gui.tch.which.net
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.61 [en] (Win98; I)
X-Accept-Language: en

I've heard things about the new PS2 and word is it aint good. Supposedly
the amount of RAM is a little on the thin side for such a hyped console
and there is no hardware anti-ailising, is this true? The supposed only
decent game is Ridge Racer 5 and even that failed to cause a rucus.

Whats all this stuff about a VU0 and VU1 maths co-processors? sounds
cool 
whatever it is, cut this maybe what all the stuff about PS2 being hard 
to program for is all about.

Call it sceptisism or just blatant lies but this is what the press has
been reporting. Mind you I'd love to see Nintendo kick arse again like
they used to. The Dreamcast might not fair as badly as most have thought
due to the press saying that the PS2 is really not that much more
powerful.......

Or am I talking pants.....

Max