Path: chuka.playstation.co.uk!news
From: "Max" <mad.max@which.net>
Newsgroups: scee.yaroze.freetalk.english
Subject: Re: GCC (sorry)
Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2001 15:13:29 -0000
Organization: PlayStation Net Yaroze (SCEE)
Lines: 59
Message-ID: <98g4t7$e3d2@www.netyaroze-europe.com>
References: <983afi$7f2@www.netyaroze-europe.com> <983k1m$7f3@www.netyaroze-europe.com> <983mun$7f5@www.netyaroze-europe.com> <98g4mt$e3d1@www.netyaroze-europe.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: modem-21.buproprione.dialup.pol.co.uk
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2314.1300
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300

Haha - "CodWarrior" - the fishy IDE!

Ahem... Sorry.

Max

Max <mad.max@which.net> wrote in message
news:98g4mt$e3d1@www.netyaroze-europe.com...
> I'd say the advantages of working with GCC is that you know all other
> Yarozians out there will be able to compile your source easily. Not
everyone
> bought CodeWarrior with thier Yaroze. But for CodWarrior: I suppose the
GUI
> environment is really desirable - I work with GCC for the Yaroze and VC++
> for the PC and VC++ makes me more productive. I bought CodeWarrior but to
me
> makefiles were easier to understand rather than all this "target" stuff.
But
> then again...
>
> I remember when I first got my Yaroze - the puzzle wasn't how to code for
> it, it was wondering how the damn makefiles worked :)
>
> Max
>
>
> Nigel Critten <Nigel@gamewarenospam.demon.co.uk> wrote in message
> news:983mun$7f5@www.netyaroze-europe.com...
> > Wow looks like I've lead a sheltered life, I'm sure once my brain comes
> back
> > from the cleaners
> > everything will become clear.
> >
> > Actually that did make sense so thanks, can you do assembler files in
the
> > same way, assemble them to object files and then link them or can they
all
> > be passed through GCC, or would inline assembler be a better idea?
> > Actually come to think of it can I even use assembler with the Yaroze.
> >
> > I'm I better of sticking with CodeWarrior? What advantages are there to
> GCC?
> >
> > Cheers
> > Nigel
> >
> > "Martin Keates" <martin@jabadaw.fsnet.co.uk> wrote in message
> > news:983k1m$7f3@www.netyaroze-europe.com...
> > > Makefiles are a beast unto themselves...
> > >
> > > But, basically you want a file called "Makefile" or "makefile"
> > > containing some rules for compilation like this:
> >
> >
> >
>
>