Path: chuka.playstation.co.uk!news From: James Rutherford Newsgroups: scee.yaroze.freetalk.english Subject: Re: Thanks, but still not sure... Date: Thu, 07 May 1998 17:48:28 +0100 Organization: The Hex Heroes Lines: 19 Message-ID: <3551E5DC.7BAF@writeme.com> References: <3549FEDD.6D64@writeme.com> <354DEE72.7982@writeme.com> <3550CF08.2060@dial.pipex.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: gfs0-008.publab.ed.ac.uk Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.03 (Win95; I) Chris Chadwick wrote: > Hope this makes sense? Nice work Chris, I'm v.grateful - and yep, seems to make perfect sense. > By the way, you don't actually need to use an array > of GsGLINES anyway. Just use a single GsGLINE variable > and initialize it's members each time before sorting it > into the OT. I think doing this is OK - it seems to > work, anyway! Yeah, it does work. I had it in my head that the address of the Gs command is sorted into the OT, but instead I guess it makes a complete copy / altered version of the command. Seems quite a lot of (extra) work... does anyone reckon that direct OT manipulation could be a way forward? James (~mrfrosty)