Path: chuka.playstation.co.uk!news From: Craig Graham Newsgroups: scee.yaroze.mydemos Subject: Re: Cyclone's psx library Date: Thu, 19 Nov 1998 20:44:21 +0000 Organization: PlayStation Net Yaroze (SCEE) Lines: 61 Message-ID: <36548324.1C03B849@hinge.mistral.co.uk> References: <01be12e3$b4b52880$233163c3@hanno> <3652F243.6D2CF054@hinge.mistral.co.uk> <01be13b1$1982e360$763163c3@hanno> <36544587.1C70EC80@hinge.mistral.co.uk> <731kta$olq7@chuka.playstation.co.uk> <36545C1C.8EA3EE1C@hinge.mistral.co.uk> <731ps0$olq8@chuka.playstation.co.uk> NNTP-Posting-Host: d2-s10-104-telehouse.mistral.co.uk Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.05 [en] (Win95; I) Peter Dollochan wrote: > I should point out I haven't seen the removed messages..... > > [Craig said this] > {It'd be nice if you posted the source to the server & the lib - saves me > havingto reverse engineer the protocol just to do a patch on the server} Actually, Craig said this: "It'd be nice if you posted the source to the server & the lib - saves me havingto reverse engineer the protocol just to do a patch on the server (seems to dislike running after anything else has used the serial port, but works ok if it's you run it before anything else (eg. CW debugger, Dial Up Networking, Hyperterminal)). Nice work though......" > Hmm maybe it was this that annoyed Pete so much in the first place the > idea that whether he uploaded the source for his project or not was > immaterial to you you were going to use his stuff come hell or .... > (by use I mean integrate into your own work) What I said was do a patch on the server to fix it's problem with openingthe serial ports after CodeWarrior has been run. Never mentioned my own stuff in the post that got Pete's mad up. > and I cant see it being relevant that you had done similar stuff > commercially My point was, I wasn't trying to rip off how the serial ports work(I know already). > Lamer - yup prolly to strong a word to be directed at the vast majority of > Yarozers. Shame on you Pete... > > various nasties - geez Craig didnt you realise it was Pete's plan to get > more > hits on his web counter, seriously though you > got amazingly > stroppy over the initial post. Didn't someone else get stressed at the accusation of Plagiarism? I thinkI was on the side of "let things go free, at least here..." in that one. > Whats it to do with me - sod all really just an opinion - All opinions welcome...... > Oh yeh why do you insist on making remarks about your salary coz lets face > it > you aint earning that much or you wouldn't mention it > (just my bit to get hits on my page ;-) I didn't say how much it was, or why I was laughing at it ;) > Pete. Craig.